the-south-asian.com                                     May/June 2003

 

Home

 

May/June 2003 
Contents

 

 Art

 The Flourishing Fake Art
 Industry of India

 
 
Music

 K L Saigal - a Musical  
 Century

 
 
 
 People

 Pico Iyer - a global
 village on 'two legs'

 Sarla Thakral - India's 1st
 lady pilot and more


 

 Technology

 Pakistan's IT Markets 
 & Telecom 
 Technologies
 - Broadband Telecomm


 Book Reviews

 'Tehri Lakeer' by Ismat
 Chughtai

 'Romance of Mango' by
 Kusum Budhwar

 
 Neighbours

 Letter from Pakistan


 Lifestyle

 'Ittar' - the oldest shop 
 for the 'real perfume' 

 

 Real Issues

 The Real Hindutva vs
  Sangh 'Hindutva'

 The Plague of our Times
 

 

 the craft shop

 Lehngas - a limited collection

 the print gallery

 Books

 Silk Road on Wheels

 The Road to Freedom

 
Enduring Spirit

 Parsis-Zoroastrians of
India

 
The Moonlight Garden

 
Contemporary Art in
 Bangladesh
 

about us            back-issues           contact us         search             data bank

 

  craft shop

print gallery

Page  1  of  2

The  Flourishing 'Fake-Art Industry' of India

by

Mukesh Khosla

 

 Fake-Art-2.jpg (144273 bytes)  Fake-Art-5a.jpg (81050 bytes)
L-R: Satish Gujral’s original painting that has been forged; Sanjay Bhattacharya's work that has been faked by the addition of a musician in the foreground

  

South Asian art and painters have been in great demand at home and abroad. Sotheby’s and other noted art auctioneers have, in the recent past, sold works of noted artists from India and Pakistan. The growing popularity of artists meant there were more buyers in the market, which, in turn, led to a rapid emergence of art galleries selling the ‘works’ of these artists. There is an abundance of such galleries not only in India but also in London and New York, selling works of artists from South Asia. But are all paintings originals? Many artists have discovered, to their horror, that their work has been forged and reproduced, at times even brilliantly executed, and is being sold as original art. Verification of the work by the artist was never more essential.

In an era of fakes, from branded electronics to life saving drugs, from liquor to cigarettes and from designer labels to cosmetics, can art remain unaffected? Not really. For years fakes have been rampant in the Indian art market and forgers have been reproducing, with unrelenting dexterity, works of Raja Ravi Verma, Jamini Roy, Amrita Shergil, Satish Gujral, M.F. Hussain, Anjolie Ela Menon, Tyab Mehta and others with startling similarity. The artists have, by and large, been silent spectators. But no longer. Satish Gujral has taken the first step towards copyright protection of art and hopes others will follow suit.

Fake art is a global phenomenon. It emerged in India almost two decades ago. Back in the seventies the value of paintings was relatively low and the fake market was not lucrative. But in the nineties the prices of original works began to spiral up and so did the market for counterfeit works. Now in the new millennium forgeries are thriving.

Fake-Art-1.jpg (78477 bytes)Satish Gujral one of India’s most celebrated artists recently detected a forgery of his own painting which ironically was brought to him for authentication by a buyer intending to purchase it from an art gallery for Rs 250,000 (a little over US $5,000). " Half a look at the painting was enough for me to dismiss it as a fake," says Gujral and adds, " My original painting was much larger. The fake was copied from a book on my works that the Lalit Kala Akademy brought out in 2000. The reproduction of the original, from which the fake was made, did not have my signature, which was deliberately omitted. But the forger had included my signature copied from another work. He obviously had no clue that I sign on the back of my paintings in some instances. Moreover, the original painting was valued at Rs. 400,000 (just under US $10,000) instead of Rs 250,000 quoted by the gallery.

Needless to say, Gujral confiscated the painting and contacted his lawyer. He sought the explanation of the gallery owner who said she had bought it from someone else. " I am not saying the gallery owner is lying. I give her the benefit of doubt and will try and trace the real culprit." If Gujral takes the case to its logical conclusion this would be one of the very rare occasions when one of the country’s premier artists will take the counterfeiter to court.

 

next page

 

 

Disclaimer 
Copyright © 2000 - 2003 [the-south-asian.com]. Intellectual Property. All rights reserved.
Home